Who is the servant-leader? The servant-leader is servant first. It
begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first. Then
conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead. That person is sharply different
from one who is leader first, perhaps because of the need to assuage an
unusual power drive or to acquire material possessions. For such it will be a
later choice to serve after leadership is established. The leader-first and the
servant-first are two extreme types. Between them there are shadings and blends
that are part of the infinite variety of human nature. The difference manifests
itself in the care taken by the servant- first to make sure that other people’s
highest priority needs are being served. The best test, and difficult to
administer, is: Do those served grow as persons? Do they, while being
served, become healthier, wiser, freer, more autonomous, more likely themselves
to become servants? And, what is the effect on the least privileged in
society; will they benefit, or, at least, not be further deprived?
As one sets out to serve,
how can one know that this will be the result? This is part of the human
dilemma; one cannot know for sure. One must, after some study and experience,
Hypothesize but leave the hypothesis under a shadow of doubt. Then one acts on the
hypothesis and examines the result. One continues to study and learn and
periodically one re-examines the hypothesis itself. Finally, one chooses again.
Perhaps one chooses the same hypothesis again and again. But it is always a
fresh open choice. And it is always an hypothesis under a shadow of doubt.
“Faith is the choice of the nobler hypothesis.” Not the noblest; one never
knows what that is. But the nobler, the best one can see when the choice
is made. Since the test of results of one’s actions is usually long delayed,
the faith that sustains the choice of the nobler hypothesis is psychological
self-insight. This is the most dependable part of the true servant. The natural
servant, the person who is servant first, is more likely to persevere
and refine a particular hypothesis on what serves another’s highest priority
needs than is the person who is leader first and who later serves out of
promptings of conscience or in conformity with normative expectations. My hope
for the future rests in part on my belief that among the legions of deprived
and unsophisticated people are many true servants who will lead, and that most
of them can learn to discriminate among those who presume to serve them and
identify the true servants whom they will follow.
Comments
Post a Comment