One of our very able
leaders recently was made the head of a large, important, and difficult-to-administer
public institution. After a short time he realized that he was not happy with
the way things were going. His approach to the problem was a bit unusual. For
three months he stopped reading newspapers and listening to news broadcasts;
and for this period he relied wholly upon those he met in the course of his
work to tell him what was going on. In three months his administrative problems
were resolved. No miracles were wrought; but out of a sustained intentness of
listening that was produced by this unusual decision, this able man learned and
received the insights needed to set the right course. And he strengthened his team
by so doing.
Why is there so little listening?
What makes this example so exceptional? Part of it, I believe, with those who
lead, is that the usual leader in the face of a difficulty tends to react by
trying to find someone else on whom to pin the problem, rather than by
automatically responding: “I have a problem. What is it? What can I do
about my problem?” The sensible person who takes the latter course will
probably react by listening, and somebody in the situation is likely to say
what the problem is and what should be done about it. Or enough will be heard
that there will be an intuitive insight that resolves it. I have a bias about
this which suggests that only a true natural servant automatically responds to
any problem by listening first. When one is a leader, this disposition
causes one to be seen as servant first. This suggests that a non-servant
who wants to be a servant might become a natural servant through a long arduous
discipline of learning to listen, a discipline sufficiently sustained that the
automatic response to any problem is to listen first. I have seen enough
remarkable transformations in people who have been trained to listen to have
some confidence in this approach. It is because true listening builds strength
in other people. Most of us at one time or another, some of us a good deal of
the time, would really like to communicate, really get through to a significant
level of meaning in the hearer’s experience.
It can be terribly
important. The best test of whether we are communicating at this depth is to ask
ourselves first: Are we really listening? Are we listening to the one we want
to communicate to? Is our basic attitude, as we approach the confrontation, one
of wanting to understand? Remember that great line from the prayer of St. Francis,
“Lord, grant that I may not seek so much to be understood as to understand.” One
must not be afraid of a little silence. Some find silence awkward or
oppressive, but a relaxed approach to dialogue will include the welcoming of
some silence. It is often a devastating question to ask oneself but it is
sometimes important to ask It “In saying what I have in mind will I really
improve on the silence?”
Comments
Post a Comment