Since the function of
leadership is to produce change, setting the direction of that change is
fundamental to leadership. Setting direction is never the same as planning or
even long-term planning, although people often confuse the two. Planning is a
management process, deductive in nature and designed to produce orderly
results, not change. Setting a direction is more inductive. Leaders gather a
broad range of data and look for patterns, relationships, and linkages that
help explain things. What’s more, the direction-setting aspect of leadership does
not produce plans; it creates vision and strategies. These describe a business,
technology, or corporate culture in terms of what it should become over the
long term and articulate a feasible way of achieving this goal. Most
discussions of vision have a tendency to degenerate into the mystical. The
implication is that a vision is something mysterious that mere mortals, even
talented ones, could never hope to have. But developing good business direction
isn’t magic. It is a tough, sometimes exhausting process of gathering and
analyzing information. People who articulate such visions aren’t magicians but
broad-based strategic thinkers who are willing to take risks. Nor do visions
and strategies have to be brilliantly innovative; in fact, some of the best are
not. Effective business visions regularly have an almost mundane quality, usually
consisting of ideas that are already well known. The particular combination or
patterning of the ideas may be new, but sometimes even that is not the case. For
example, when CEO Jan Carlzon articulated his vision to make Scandinavian
Airline Systems (SAS) the best airline in the world for the frequent business
traveler, he was not saying anything that everyone in the airline industry
didn’t already know. Business travelers fly more consistently than other market
segments and are generally willing to pay higher fares. Thus focusing on
business customers offers an airline the possibility of high margins, steady
business, and considerable growth. But in an industry known more for
bureaucracy than vision, no company had ever put these simple ideas together
and dedicated itself to implementing them. SAS did, and it worked. What’s
crucial about a vision is not its originality but how well it serves the interests
of important constituencies’ customers, stockholders, employees and how easily
it can be translated into a realistic competitive strategy. Bad visions tend to
ignore the legitimate needs and rights of important constituencies favoring,
say, employees over customers or stockholders. Or they are strategically
unsound. When a company that has never been better than a weak competitor in an
industry suddenly starts talking about becoming number one that is a pipe
dream, not a vision. One of the most frequent mistakes that over managed and underled
corporations make is to embrace “long-term planning” as a panacea for their lack
of direction and inability to adapt to an increasingly competitive and dynamic
business environment. But such an approach misinterprets the nature of direction
setting and can never work. Long-term planning is always time consuming. Whenever
something unexpected happens, plans have to be redone. In a dynamic business
environment, the unexpected often becomes the norm, and long-term planning can
become an extraordinarily burdensome activity. This is why most successful
corporations limit the time frame of their planning activities. Indeed, some
even consider “long-term planning” a contradiction in terms. In a company
without direction, even short-term planning can become a black hole capable of
absorbing an infinite amount of time and energy. With no vision and strategy to
provide constraints around the planning process or to guide it, every
eventuality deserves a plan. Under these circumstances, contingency planning
can go on forever, draining time and attention from far more essential activities,
yet without ever providing the clear sense of direction that a company
desperately needs. After a while, managers inevitably become cynical about all
this, and the planning process can degenerate into a highly politicized game. Planning
works best not as a substitute for direction setting but as a complement to it.
A competent planning process serves as a useful reality check on direction-setting
activities. Likewise, a competent direction-setting process provides a focus in
which planning can then be realistically carried out. It helps clarify what
kind of planning is essential and what kind is irrelevant.
Function of the Holy Spirit. This list of the 70 Functions of the Holy Spirit come from her research. He leads and directs. (Matthew 4:1; Mark 1:12; Luke 2:27; 4:1; Acts 8:29; Romans 8:14) The Holy Spirit speaks – in, to and through. (Matthew 10:20; Acts 1:16; 2:4; 13:2; 28:25; Hebrews 3:7) He gives power to cast out devils. (Matthew 12:28) He releases power. (Luke 4:14) The Holy Spirit anoints. (Luke 4:18; Acts 10:38) The Holy Spirit “comes upon” or “falls on”. (Matthew 3:16; Mark 1:10; Luke 2:25; 3:22; 4:18; John 1:32,33; Acts 10:44; 11:15) He baptizes and fills. (Matthew 3:11; Mark 1:8; Luke 1:15,41,67; 3:16, 4:1; John 1:33; Acts 1:4-5; 2:4; 4:8,31; 6:3,5; 7:55; 10:47; 11:24; 13:9,52; 1 Corinthians 12:12) He gives new birth. (John 3:5,8) He leads into worship. (John 4:23) He flows like a river from the spirit man. (John 7:38-39) He ministers truth. (John 14:17; 15:26; 16:13) He dwells in people. (John 14:
Very informative and impressive post you have written, this is quite interesting and i have went through it completely, an upgraded information is shared, keep sharing such valuable information. Financial Goals for a Business
ReplyDeleteNice article on of Planning.
ReplyDelete