Skip to main content

LEADERSHIP TRAITS AND CHARACTERISTICS


An important characteristic of leadership is using human talents to grow performance, trust and integrity in employees and the organization (Daft, 2005).  One’s personality plays a major role in the way they lead.  Personality is a combination of traits (distinguishing personal characteristics) that classifies an individual’s behavior.  Personality affects conduct as well as insight and attitudes.  Knowing personalities helps explain and forecast others’ behavior and job performance (Lussier & Achua, 2004).  The Big Five Model of Personality assesses whether a person is stronger in surgency, agreeableness, adjustment, conscientiousness, or openness to experience. 
Surgency includes leadership and extraversion traits (Lussier & Achua, 2004). The need for power compares to the Big Five dimension of surgency.  People with a high need for power are depicted as wanting to control situations and enjoy competition in which they can win because they do not like to lose. 
They lean toward being ambitious and have a lower need for affiliation.  They are more concerned with influencing other people than they are with what other people think about them (Lussier & Achua,). 
Extraversion is the extent that a person is outgoing, sociable, talkative, and relaxed in meeting and talking with new people.   A person with high marks in surgency wants to be in charge and have influence over others (Daft, 2005).  Influencing is the ability of the leader to communicate ideas effectively to employees so employees will not only accept these ideas but motivate them to implement needed changes.
Agreeableness is the trait of being able to get along with other people.  Some behaviors that characterize agreeableness are being good-natured, cooperative, forgiving, and compassionate, understanding and trusting (Daft, 2005).  The need for affiliation compares to the Big Five dimension of agreeableness.  They are socially motivated and seek close relationships whether in a group setting or with personal friends.  They are more concerned with what other people think about them than influencing other people (Lussier & Achua, 2004). 
Adjustment is commonly referred to as emotional stability.  This trait shows the level that people are well-adjusted, calm and secure (Daft, 2005).
Conscientiousness includes traits related to achievement (Lussier & Achua, 2004).  People with a high need for achievement take responsibility for solving problems, are goal oriented, seek challenges, strive for excellence, desire concrete feedback on their performance and work hard.  They perform well in non-routine, challenging, and competitive situations (Lussier & Achua).  Conscientiousness also shows how well a person is responsible, dependable, and persistent. 
This trait is more concerned with tasks to be completed rather than relationships (Daft, 2005). 
Openness to experience relates to a person being willing to change, try new things, imaginative, creative and having a broader range of interests (Daft, 2005). 
Kouzes & Posner (2007) described how credibility is the foundation of leadership:
Everyone wants to be fully confident in their leaders, and to be fully confident they have to believe that their leaders are individuals of strong character and solid integrity. 
To be credible in action, leaders must be clear about their beliefs; they must know what they stand for.  Then they must put what they say into practice:  they must act on their beliefs and “do”.    
A leader can not model the way nor enable others to act if they are not seen as being honest and trustworthy (Kouzes & Posner).  Honesty is seen as the utmost important characteristic between leaders and employees.  Being proud of where one works, perceived as a team member, valuing the values of the organization, having a sense of belongingness and ownership are benefits of a credible leader.  Unmotivated or motivated only for money, low production, criticizing the organization, looking for another job and having a feeling of being unappreciated are characteristics of a leader that has lost credibility (Kouzes & Posner).  If a leader is found to be dishonest, they lose respect among the employees which leads to a loss of motivation and over time the employee loses self-respect (Kouzes & Posner).    

Comments

  1. Leadership awareness occurs with engagement in our community. It is from these experiences where we start to formulate broad ideas about leadership.

    Leadership expert in the UK

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FUNCTIONS OF THE HOLY SPIRIT

Function of the Holy Spirit. This list of the 70 Functions of the Holy Spirit come from her research. He leads and directs. (Matthew 4:1; Mark 1:12; Luke 2:27; 4:1; Acts 8:29; Romans 8:14) The Holy Spirit speaks – in, to and through. (Matthew 10:20; Acts 1:16; 2:4; 13:2; 28:25; Hebrews 3:7) He gives power to cast out devils. (Matthew 12:28) He releases power. (Luke 4:14) The Holy Spirit anoints. (Luke 4:18; Acts 10:38) The Holy Spirit “comes upon” or “falls on”. (Matthew 3:16; Mark 1:10; Luke 2:25; 3:22; 4:18; John 1:32,33; Acts 10:44; 11:15) He baptizes and fills. (Matthew 3:11; Mark 1:8; Luke 1:15,41,67; 3:16, 4:1; John 1:33; Acts 1:4-5; 2:4; 4:8,31; 6:3,5; 7:55; 10:47; 11:24; 13:9,52; 1 Corinthians 12:12) He gives new birth. (John 3:5,8) He leads into worship. (John 4:23) He flows like a river from the spirit man. (John 7:38-39) He ministers truth. (John 14:17; 15:26; 16:13) He dwells in people. (John 14:

SETTING A DIRECTION VS PLANNING AND BUDGETING

Since the function of leadership is to produce change, setting the direction of that change is fundamental to leadership. Setting direction is never the same as planning or even long-term planning, although people often confuse the two. Planning is a management process, deductive in nature and designed to produce orderly results, not change. Setting a direction is more inductive. Leaders gather a broad range of data and look for patterns, relationships, and linkages that help explain things. What’s more, the direction-setting aspect of leadership does not produce plans; it creates vision and strategies. These describe a business, technology, or corporate culture in terms of what it should become over the long term and articulate a feasible way of achieving this goal. Most discussions of vision have a tendency to degenerate into the mystical. The implication is that a vision is something mysterious that mere mortals, even talented ones, could never hope to have. But developing

ALIGNING PEOPLE VS ORGANIZING AND STAFFING

A central feature of modern organizations is interdependence, where no one has complete autonomy, where most employees are tied to many others by their work, technology, management systems, and hierarchy. These linkages present a special challenge when organizations attempt to change. Unless many individuals line up and move together in the same direction, people will tend to fall all over one another. To executives who are overeducated in management and undereducated in leadership, the idea of getting people moving in the same direction appears to be an organizational problem. What executives need to do, however, is not organize people but align them. Managers “organize” to create human systems that can implement plans as precisely and efficiently as possible. Typically, this requires a number of potentially complex decisions. A company must choose a structure of jobs and reporting relationships, staff it with individuals suited to the jobs, provide training for those who need it,