Skip to main content

CREDIBILITY IS THE FOUNDATION OF LEADERSHIP



Leadership is a relationship between those who aspire to lead and those who chose to follow. Sometimes the relationship is one-to-one; sometimes it’s one-to-many. But regardless of whether the followers number one or one thousand, leadership is a relationship.
                              Barry Posner and I have been conducting research on this relationship for more than two decades. What is most striking and most evident from our research is that over time and across continents, the single most important quality people admire is personal credibility. Credibility is the foundation of leadership. We want to believe in our leaders. We want to have faith and confidence in them as people. We want to believe that their word can be trusted, that they are personally excited and enthusiastic about the direction in which we are headed, and that they have the knowledge and skill to lead. If people don’t believe in the messenger, they won’t believe the message. Values and beliefs are at the core of personal credibility. To be credible, leaders must know who they are and what they stand for.
                              Our colleagues Ciulla, O’Toole, Badaracco, and Bolman and Deal share our view that ethics, morality, honesty, character, and personal discipline matter. Somewhere along the way during the irrationally exuberant, soaring-stock-market days of the 1990s, these notions came to be viewed by some observers, at Least as quaint and unfit for the “brand me” school of leadership. No longer. Once we learned that the books had been cooked and we watched the air get sucked out of our retirement accounts, we emerged from a fantasy world to realize just how much character and courage count. Many people around the globe, though, have been made more cynical by all the illegalities and immoralities.
                              Many are fed up, angry, disgusted, and pessimistic about their future. Trust is so low among some groups that they’d rather keep their money under a mattress than invest it in equities. One of the most critical lessons from all this is that our entire capitalist system is really based on faith. If people don’t believe in those who handle their money, their livelihoods, and their lives, they’ll just refuse to participate. We can all expect many more massive and wrenching changes in the years to come. The efficacy of any change initiative is inextricably linked to the credibility of the individuals leading the efforts. Constituents will become willingly involved to the extent that they believe in the people sponsoring the change. It is wise, therefore, for leaders to begin every significant change with a “credit check.” It’s not just “Do they believe that the new CRM system will improve our performance?” It’s also “Do they believe in me and my ability to lead this change effort?”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FUNCTIONS OF THE HOLY SPIRIT

Function of the Holy Spirit. This list of the 70 Functions of the Holy Spirit come from her research. He leads and directs. (Matthew 4:1; Mark 1:12; Luke 2:27; 4:1; Acts 8:29; Romans 8:14) The Holy Spirit speaks – in, to and through. (Matthew 10:20; Acts 1:16; 2:4; 13:2; 28:25; Hebrews 3:7) He gives power to cast out devils. (Matthew 12:28) He releases power. (Luke 4:14) The Holy Spirit anoints. (Luke 4:18; Acts 10:38) The Holy Spirit “comes upon” or “falls on”. (Matthew 3:16; Mark 1:10; Luke 2:25; 3:22; 4:18; John 1:32,33; Acts 10:44; 11:15) He baptizes and fills. (Matthew 3:11; Mark 1:8; Luke 1:15,41,67; 3:16, 4:1; John 1:33; Acts 1:4-5; 2:4; 4:8,31; 6:3,5; 7:55; 10:47; 11:24; 13:9,52; 1 Corinthians 12:12) He gives new birth. (John 3:5,8) He leads into worship. (John 4:23) He flows like a river from the spirit man. (John 7:38-39) He ministers truth. (John 14:17; 15:26; 16:13) He dwells in people. (John 14:

SETTING A DIRECTION VS PLANNING AND BUDGETING

Since the function of leadership is to produce change, setting the direction of that change is fundamental to leadership. Setting direction is never the same as planning or even long-term planning, although people often confuse the two. Planning is a management process, deductive in nature and designed to produce orderly results, not change. Setting a direction is more inductive. Leaders gather a broad range of data and look for patterns, relationships, and linkages that help explain things. What’s more, the direction-setting aspect of leadership does not produce plans; it creates vision and strategies. These describe a business, technology, or corporate culture in terms of what it should become over the long term and articulate a feasible way of achieving this goal. Most discussions of vision have a tendency to degenerate into the mystical. The implication is that a vision is something mysterious that mere mortals, even talented ones, could never hope to have. But developing

ALIGNING PEOPLE VS ORGANIZING AND STAFFING

A central feature of modern organizations is interdependence, where no one has complete autonomy, where most employees are tied to many others by their work, technology, management systems, and hierarchy. These linkages present a special challenge when organizations attempt to change. Unless many individuals line up and move together in the same direction, people will tend to fall all over one another. To executives who are overeducated in management and undereducated in leadership, the idea of getting people moving in the same direction appears to be an organizational problem. What executives need to do, however, is not organize people but align them. Managers “organize” to create human systems that can implement plans as precisely and efficiently as possible. Typically, this requires a number of potentially complex decisions. A company must choose a structure of jobs and reporting relationships, staff it with individuals suited to the jobs, provide training for those who need it,