Skip to main content

NO!!! I NEVER ASKED FOR NNAMDI KANU'S HANGING = OKOROCHA

Representative Rochas Okorocha of Imo State, on Wednesday depicted as unwarranted and malevolent the claim that he required the hanging of the Director of Radio Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu. Okorocha in an announcement by his Chief Press Secretary, Mr. Sam Onwuemeodo, said the report distributed in the online networking was a minor endeavor to defame his picture in front of the 2019 general decision.

The announcement peruses: "The consideration of the Imo State Government has at the end of the day been attracted to another imaginary assertion in the online networking guaranteeing that the state Governor had required the hanging of Mr. Nnamdi Kanu pioneer of the Indigenous individuals of Biafra (IPOB). "Senator Okorocha does not know Nnamdi Kanu. He peruses about him on the pages of daily papers such as each other Igbo man or Nigerian. Whether he lives or passes on, does not have any quality to add to Governor Okorocha's life including his governmental issues. So one starts to ask why Governor Okorocha ought to require his hanging. "In the event that he kicks the bucket, will Okorocha get to be Director of Radio Biafra or IPOB pioneer? You ask once more, whether one million Nnamdi Kanu could constitute any risk to Okorocha in at any rate. The answer is clearly No. At that point what is Okorocha's enthusiasm for Kanu's passing or life that he would require his hanging. "The components behind this most recent moonlight story likewise guaranteed that the Imo Governor had decided on January 15, 2016 in a meeting with what they called Igbo Elders' Forum. "They didn't specify the venue of the said meeting or those at the meeting. Of course, the same January 15, 2016 (Friday) was the day the Governor went out of the nation for a brief get-away

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FUNCTIONS OF THE HOLY SPIRIT

Function of the Holy Spirit. This list of the 70 Functions of the Holy Spirit come from her research. He leads and directs. (Matthew 4:1; Mark 1:12; Luke 2:27; 4:1; Acts 8:29; Romans 8:14) The Holy Spirit speaks – in, to and through. (Matthew 10:20; Acts 1:16; 2:4; 13:2; 28:25; Hebrews 3:7) He gives power to cast out devils. (Matthew 12:28) He releases power. (Luke 4:14) The Holy Spirit anoints. (Luke 4:18; Acts 10:38) The Holy Spirit “comes upon” or “falls on”. (Matthew 3:16; Mark 1:10; Luke 2:25; 3:22; 4:18; John 1:32,33; Acts 10:44; 11:15) He baptizes and fills. (Matthew 3:11; Mark 1:8; Luke 1:15,41,67; 3:16, 4:1; John 1:33; Acts 1:4-5; 2:4; 4:8,31; 6:3,5; 7:55; 10:47; 11:24; 13:9,52; 1 Corinthians 12:12) He gives new birth. (John 3:5,8) He leads into worship. (John 4:23) He flows like a river from the spirit man. (John 7:38-39) He ministers truth. (John 14:17; 15:26; 16:13) He dwells in people. (John 14:

SETTING A DIRECTION VS PLANNING AND BUDGETING

Since the function of leadership is to produce change, setting the direction of that change is fundamental to leadership. Setting direction is never the same as planning or even long-term planning, although people often confuse the two. Planning is a management process, deductive in nature and designed to produce orderly results, not change. Setting a direction is more inductive. Leaders gather a broad range of data and look for patterns, relationships, and linkages that help explain things. What’s more, the direction-setting aspect of leadership does not produce plans; it creates vision and strategies. These describe a business, technology, or corporate culture in terms of what it should become over the long term and articulate a feasible way of achieving this goal. Most discussions of vision have a tendency to degenerate into the mystical. The implication is that a vision is something mysterious that mere mortals, even talented ones, could never hope to have. But developing

ON BUHARI, NEW YORK TMES WROTE

Four months after seizing power, Nigeria’s military leaders appear to be suffering an erosion of popular support. Last Dec. 31, Maj. Gen. Mohammed Buhari led a group of young officers in a coup against the civilian Government of President Shehu Shagari, saying the takeover was necessary to save Nigeria, Africa’s richest and most populous nation, from economic collapse. The military intervention appeared at the time to enjoy enthusiastic support from a broad range of Nigeria’s population. Many intellectuals argued that the corruption and incompetence of the Shagari administration had made drastic action both necessary and inevitable. Traders, merchants and people in the streets welcomed the soldiers and looked forward to a quick improvement in their standard of living. Growing Disappointment Recently, however, there seems to be growing disappointment with both the military Government’s approach and pace. Since coming to power, this Government has not found a sing