Skip to main content

COURT FREES NNAMDI KANU FROM DSS DETENTION, ORDERS HIM REMANDED IN KUJE PRISON

John Tsoho, equity of the government high court, Abuja, has requested that Nnamdi Kanu be remanded in Kuje jail pending his trial for injustice. The Federal High Court additionally struck out six charges of treasonable crime brought against Kanu by the Department of State Services (DSS). Tsoho, the judge, gave the request in the wake of listening to Mohammed Diri, advice to the Department of State Services (DSS), and Chuks Muoma (SAN), insight to Kanu. Muoma had contended that the blamed individual be remanded in jail authority far from the cell of the DSS.

He contended that since his imprisonment, his customer has been kept incommunicado for three months inside of the limitations the SSS office. He facilitate asked the court to send the denounced individual to jail so that his family could have admittance to him. Diri, on the other hand, asked the court to keep Kanu in the guardianship of the DSS for security reasons. In any case, the judge decided that the litigant be kept in the guardianship of the Nigeria Prison Service, Kuje. Kanu landed at the court a couple of minutes past 9am looking unkempt.

On December 23, 2015, he had declined to take his supplication before Ahmed Mohammed, equity of the government high court, Abuja, refering to absence of trust in the court. This was after Adeniyi Ademola, another equity of the government high court, Abuja, requested the DSS to discharge him genuinely, and after a boss judge court released and vindicated of charges of criminal intimidation and responsibility for society.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FUNCTIONS OF THE HOLY SPIRIT

Function of the Holy Spirit. This list of the 70 Functions of the Holy Spirit come from her research. He leads and directs. (Matthew 4:1; Mark 1:12; Luke 2:27; 4:1; Acts 8:29; Romans 8:14) The Holy Spirit speaks – in, to and through. (Matthew 10:20; Acts 1:16; 2:4; 13:2; 28:25; Hebrews 3:7) He gives power to cast out devils. (Matthew 12:28) He releases power. (Luke 4:14) The Holy Spirit anoints. (Luke 4:18; Acts 10:38) The Holy Spirit “comes upon” or “falls on”. (Matthew 3:16; Mark 1:10; Luke 2:25; 3:22; 4:18; John 1:32,33; Acts 10:44; 11:15) He baptizes and fills. (Matthew 3:11; Mark 1:8; Luke 1:15,41,67; 3:16, 4:1; John 1:33; Acts 1:4-5; 2:4; 4:8,31; 6:3,5; 7:55; 10:47; 11:24; 13:9,52; 1 Corinthians 12:12) He gives new birth. (John 3:5,8) He leads into worship. (John 4:23) He flows like a river from the spirit man. (John 7:38-39) He ministers truth. (John 14:17; 15:26; 16:13) He dwells in people. (John 14:...
Post a Comment
Read more

SETTING A DIRECTION VS PLANNING AND BUDGETING

Since the function of leadership is to produce change, setting the direction of that change is fundamental to leadership. Setting direction is never the same as planning or even long-term planning, although people often confuse the two. Planning is a management process, deductive in nature and designed to produce orderly results, not change. Setting a direction is more inductive. Leaders gather a broad range of data and look for patterns, relationships, and linkages that help explain things. What’s more, the direction-setting aspect of leadership does not produce plans; it creates vision and strategies. These describe a business, technology, or corporate culture in terms of what it should become over the long term and articulate a feasible way of achieving this goal. Most discussions of vision have a tendency to degenerate into the mystical. The implication is that a vision is something mysterious that mere mortals, even talented ones, could never hope to have. But developing ...
2 comments
Read more

LAISSEZ-FAIRE LEADERSHIP

The Laissez-Faire leadership style frequently has a negative connotation.   This style of leadership depicts an inert leader who is averse to stimulating subordinates or giving focus (Deluga, 1990).   The Laissezz-Faire leadership style places an emphasis on the employee centered attribute that was discussed in the University of Michigan and Ohio State University studies (Professional Organizations, n.d.).   Leaders who use this style fail their employees because they offer no positive or negative direction nor do they interfere at any time (Webb, 2007).   According to Deluga (1990), Laissezz-Faire leaders renounce their leadership thus giving employees a wide spectrum of decision-making which could lead to amplifying their power and influence.     Another assessment of research reported these leaders shun goal-setting, opportunities to succeed, fail to coordinate organizational objectives, ignore responsibilities, and routinely avoid making d...
Post a Comment
Read more