A Normative Critique. The Nigerian Civil War, also
known as the Biafran War, 6 July 1967 – 15 January 1970, was a war fought to
counter the secession of Biafra from Nigeria. Biafra represented nationalist
aspirations of the Igbo people, whose leadership felt they could no longer
coexist with the Northern-dominated federal government. The conflict resulted
from political, economic, ethnic, cultural and religious tensions which
preceded Britain's formal decolonization of Nigeria from 1960 to 1963.
Immediate causes of the war in 1966 included a military coup, a counter-coup,
and persecution of Igbo living in Northern Nigeria. Control over oil production
in the Niger Delta played a vital strategic role.
Within a year, the Federal
Military Government surrounded Biafra, capturing coastal oil facilities and the
city of Port Harcourt. The blockade imposed during the ensuing stalemate led to
severe famine accomplished deliberately as a war strategy. Over the two and
half years of the war, about two million civilians died from starvation and
diseases.
This famine entered world
awareness in mid-1968, when images of malnourished and starving children
suddenly saturated the mass media of Western countries. The plight of the
starving Biafrans became a cause célèbre in foreign countries, enabling a
significant rise in the funding and prominence of international non-governmental
organisations. Britain and the Soviet Union were the main backers of the
Federal Military Government in Lagos, while France and some independent
elements supported Biafra. France and Israel provided weapons to both
combatants.
Ethnic division
Like most other African
countries, British Nigeria grouped people together for governance without
respect for their religious, linguistic, and ethnic differences. Nigeria, which
gained independence from the United Kingdom in 1960, had at that time a
population of 60 million people consisting of nearly 300 differing ethnic and
cultural groups.
More than fifty years earlier,
the United Kingdom had carved an area out of West Africa containing hundreds of
different ethnic groups and unified it, calling it Nigeria. Although the area
contained many different groups, the three predominant groups were the Igbo,
which formed between 60–70% of the population in the southeast; the
Hausa-Fulani, which formed about 65% of the peoples in the northern part of the
territory; and the Yoruba, which formed about 75% of the population in the
southwestern part. Although these groups have their own homelands, by the 1960s
they were dispersed across Nigeria, with all three ethnic groups represented
substantially in major cities. When the war broke out in 1967 there were still
5,000 Igbos in Lagos.
The semi-feudal and Islamic
Hausa-Fulani in the North were traditionally ruled by a feudal, conservative
Islamic hierarchy consisting of Emirs who, in turn, owed their allegiance to a
supreme Sultan. This Sultan was regarded as the source of all political power
and religious authority.
The Yoruba political system in
the southwest, like that of the Hausa-Fulani, also consisted of a series of
monarchs, the Oba. The Yoruba monarchs, however, were less autocratic than
those in the North, and the political and social system of the Yoruba
accordingly allowed for greater upward mobility based on acquired rather than
inherited wealth and title.
The Igbo in the southeast, in
contrast to the two other groups, lived mostly in autonomous, democratically organised
communities, although there were monarchs in many of these ancient cities such
as the Kingdom of Nri. In its zenith the Kingdom controlled most of Igbo land,
including influence on the Anioma people, Arochukwu, and Onitsha land. Unlike
the other two regions, decisions among the Igbo were made by a general assembly
in which men could participate.
The differing political systems
among these three peoples reflected and produced divergent customs and values.
The Hausa-Fulani commoners, having contact with the political system only
through a village head designated by the Emir or one of his subordinates, did
not view political leaders as amenable to influence. Political decisions were
to be submitted to. As with other highly authoritarian religious and political
systems, leadership positions were taken by persons willing to be subservient
and loyal to superiors. A chief function of this political system was to
maintain Islamic and conservative values, which caused many Hausa-Fulani to
view economic and social innovation as subversive or sacrilegious. In contrast
to the Hausa-Fulani, the Igbo often participated directly in the decisions
which affected their lives. They had a lively awareness of the political system
and regarded it as an instrument for achieving their own personal goals. Status
was acquired through the ability to arbitrate disputes that might arise in the
village, and through acquiring rather than inheriting wealth. Igbos were
substantially victimized in the Atlantic slave trade; in the year 1790 it was
reported that of 20,000 people sold each year from Bonny, 16,000 were Igbo.
With their emphasis upon social achievement and political participation, the
Igbo adapted to and challenged colonial rule in innovative ways.
These tradition-derived differences
were perpetuated and perhaps even enhanced by the British system of colonial
rule in Nigeria. In the North, the British found it convenient to rule
indirectly through the Emirs, thus perpetuating rather than changing the
indigenous authoritarian political system. As a concomitant of this system,
Christian missionaries were excluded from the North, and the area thus remained
virtually closed to European cultural imperialism, in contrast to the Igbo, the
richest of whom sent many of their sons to British universities. During the
ensuing years, the Northern Emirs thus were able to maintain traditional
political and religious institutions, while reinforcing their social structure.
In this division, the North, at the time of independence in 1960, was by far
the most underdeveloped area in Nigeria, with an English literacy rate of 2% as
compared to 19.2% in the East, learned in connection with religious education,
was much higher). The West enjoyed a much higher literacy level, being the
first part of the country to have contact with western education in addition to
the free primary education program of the pre-independence Western Regional
Government. In the South, the missionaries rapidly introduced Western forms of
education. Consequently, the Yoruba were the first group in Nigeria to adopt
Western bureaucratic social norms and they provided the first African civil
servants, doctors, lawyers, and other technicians and professionals.
In Igbo areas, missionaries were
introduced at a later date because of British difficulty in establishing firm
control over the highly autonomous Igbo communities. However, the Igbo people
took to Western education actively, and they overwhelmingly came to adopt
Christianity. Population pressure in the Igbo homeland combined with
aspirations for monetary wages drove thousands of Igbo to other parts of
Nigeria in search of work. By the 1960s, Igbo political culture was more
unified and the region relatively prosperous, with tradesmen and literate
elites active not just in the traditionally Igbo South, but throughout Nigeria.
Therefore, by 1966, the ethnic and religious differences between Northerners
and Igbos had combined with additional stratification of education and class.
Intellectuals began to agitate for greater rights and independence. The size of
this intellectual class increased significantly in the 1950s, with the massive
expansion of the national education program. During the 1940s and 1950s the Igbo
and Yoruba parties were in the forefront of the fight for independence from
Britain. They also wanted an independent Nigeria to be organised into several
small states so that the conservative North could not dominate the country.
Northern leaders, fearful that independence would mean political and economic
domination by the more Westernized elites in the South, preferred the
perpetuation of British rule. As a condition for accepting independence, they
demanded that the country continue to be divided into three regions with the
North having a clear majority. Igbo and Yoruba leaders, anxious to obtain an
independent country at all costs, accepted the Northern demands.
However it would be wrong to
state that the two Southern regions were politically or philosophically aligned
and there were already discordance between the two Southern political parties.
Firstly, the AG favoured a loose
confederacy of regions in the emergent Nigerian nation whereby each region
would be in total control of its own distinct territory. The status of Lagos
was a sore point for the AG which did not want Lagos, a Yoruba town which was
at that time the Federal Capital and seat of national government to be
designated as the Capital of Nigeria if it meant loss of Yoruba Suzerainty. The
AG insisted that Lagos, a Yoruba city which was situated in Western Nigeria
must be completely recognized as a Yoruba town without any loss of identity,
control or autonomy by the Yoruba. Contrary to this position, the NCNC was
anxious to declare Lagos, by virtue of it being the "Federal Capital
Territory" as "no man's land" - a declaration which as could be
expected angered the AG which offered to help fund the development of other
territory in Nigeria as "Federal Capital Territory" and then
threatened secession from Nigeria if it didn't get its way. The threat of
secession by the AG was tabled, documented and recorded in numerous
constitutional conferences, including the constitutional conference held in
london in 1954 with the demand that a right of secession be enshrined in the
constitution of the emerging Nigerian nation to allow any part of the emergent
nation to opt out of Nigeria, should the need arise.: Tekena N. TamunoSource:
The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 563-584 ) This proposal for inclusion of right of
secession by the regions in independent Nigeria by the AG was rejected and
resisted by NCNC which vehemently argued for a tightly bound united/unitary
structured nation because it viewed the provision of a secession clause as
detrimental to the formation of a Unitary Nigerian state. In the face of
sustained opposition by the NCNC delegates, later joined by the NPC and backed
by threats to view maintenance of the inclusion of secession by the AG as
treasonable by the British, the AG was forced to renounce its position of
inclusion of the right of secession a part of the Nigerian constitution. It
should be noted that, had such a provision been made in the Nigerian
constitution, later events which led to the Nigerian/Biafran civil war would
have been avoided. The pre-independence alliance between the NCNC and the NPC
against the aspirations of the AG would later set the tone for political
governance of independent Nigeria by the NCNC/NPC and lead to disaster in later
years in Nigeria.
Northern–Southern tension
manifested on 1 May 1953, as fighting in the Northern city of Kano. The
political parties tended to focus on building power in their own regions,
resulting in an incoherent and disunified dynamic in the federal government.
In 1946, the British divided the
Southern Region into the Western Region and the Eastern Region. Each government
was entitled to collect royalties from resources extracted within its area.
This changed in 1956 when Shell-BP found large petroleum deposits in the
Eastern region. A Commission led by Jeremy Raisman and Ronald Tress determined
that resource royalties would now enter a "Distributable Pools
Account" with the money split between different parts of government . To
ensure continuing influence, the British promoted unity in the Northern bloc
and discord among and within the two Southern regions, as well as the creation
of a new Mid-Western Region in an area with oil potential. The new constitution
of 1946 also proclaimed that "The entire property in and control of all
mineral oils, in, under, or upon any lands, in Nigeria, and of all rivers,
streams, and water courses throughout Nigeria, is and shall be vested in, the
Crown." Britain profited significantly from a fivefold rise in Nigerian
exports amidst the postwar economic boom.
Comments
Post a Comment